Index Funds: The Power of Passive Investing

Over 90% of actively managed funds underperform their benchmark over 15 years. The simplest strategy in history is also the most effective: buy the whole market.

Index Funds: The Power of Passive Investing
Index Funds: The Power of Passive Investing — The Omaha Method
ART. 1 — YOUR MONEY

Index Funds: The Power of Passive Investing

Over 90% of actively managed funds underperform their benchmark index over 15 years. The simplest, cheapest, most effective investment strategy in history is also the most boring: buy the whole market.

The Case for Indexing

In 1976, John Bogle launched the first index fund available to retail investors — the Vanguard 500 Index Fund. Wall Street mocked it as "Bogle's Folly." Four decades later, index funds hold over $15 trillion in assets and have delivered better returns than the vast majority of professional money managers. The revolution is complete: passive investing won.

The logic is irrefutable. In aggregate, all investors hold the entire market. Before costs, the average active investor earns the market return. After costs — management fees, trading commissions, taxes from frequent trading — the average active investor earns less than the market return. Therefore, a low-cost index fund that simply holds the market will beat the majority of active managers over time.

@JohnBogle
Don't look for the needle in the haystack. Just buy the haystack.

The SPIVA Scorecard: The Data Is Brutal

Time Period% of US Large-Cap Funds Underperforming S&P 500% of European Funds Underperforming Benchmark
1 Year~55–65%~60–70%
5 Years~75–85%~75–85%
10 Years~85–90%~85–90%
15 Years~90–95%~90–95%
20 Years~92–97%~90–95%
📊 The SPIVA Scorecard (S&P Indices vs. Active) is published semi-annually and consistently shows the same result across every geography, every asset class, every time period: the vast majority of active managers fail to beat a simple index. This is not opinion — it is data.

The Index Universe

Index Fund / ETFIndex TrackedTERCoverageBest For
Vanguard FTSE All-World (VWCE)FTSE All-World0.22%~3,700 stocks, 49 countriesGlobal diversification, single fund
iShares Core MSCI World (IWDA)MSCI World0.20%~1,500 stocks, 23 developed marketsDeveloped market exposure
Vanguard S&P 500 (VUAA)S&P 5000.07%500 US large-cap stocksUS market core
iShares Core MSCI EM (IEMA)MSCI Emerging Markets0.18%~1,400 stocks, 24 EM countriesEmerging market exposure
Vanguard Global Aggregate BondBloomberg Global Agg0.10%Global investment-grade bondsBond diversification
Invesco EQQQNasdaq-1000.30%100 US tech/growth stocksTechnology tilt
@WarrenBuffett
A low-cost index fund is the most sensible equity investment for the great majority of investors. My mentor Ben Graham took this position many years ago, and everything I have seen since convinces me of its truth.

One-Fund Portfolios

The ultimate simplification: a single global index fund like VWCE provides exposure to over 3,700 stocks across 49 countries, automatically rebalanced, for 0.22% per year. Combined with DCA (which we covered last week), this creates an investment system that requires less than 10 minutes per month and outperforms 90%+ of professional investors.

💡 The Omaha Method starter portfolio: 1) Open an account with a low-cost broker (DEGIRO, Interactive Brokers, Trade Republic). 2) Set up monthly automatic investment in VWCE or IWDA. 3) Allocate according to your risk tolerance (80/20 stocks/bonds for young investors, 60/40 for moderate). 4) Rebalance annually. 5) Do not check daily. That's it.

When Active Management Makes Sense

Indexing is not always the answer. In illiquid markets (small-cap, frontier markets, private credit), active managers with genuine expertise can add value. In tax management, active strategies like tax-loss harvesting can improve after-tax returns. And for investors who genuinely enjoy research and have demonstrated skill, concentrated portfolios can outperform — though this describes a very small minority.

⚠️ The burden of proof is on active management. If you choose an active fund, demand evidence: audited long-term track record (10+ years), consistent outperformance after fees, low manager turnover, and transparent strategy. The default should always be index.
@CharlieMunger
The desire to get rich fast is pretty dangerous. The way to get rich slowly is to buy an index fund and let compound interest do the heavy lifting.

Fondi Indicizzati: Il Potere dell'Investimento Passivo

Oltre il 90% dei fondi gestiti attivamente sottoperforma il proprio indice di riferimento in 15 anni. La strategia d'investimento più semplice, economica ed efficace della storia è anche la più noiosa: comprare l'intero mercato.

Il Caso per l'Indicizzazione

Nel 1976, John Bogle lanciò il primo fondo indicizzato retail — il Vanguard 500. Wall Street lo definì "la follia di Bogle". Quattro decenni dopo, i fondi indicizzati detengono oltre $15 trilioni. La logica è inconfutabile: dopo i costi, l'investitore attivo medio guadagna meno del rendimento di mercato.

@JohnBogle
Non cercate l'ago nel pagliaio. Comprate il pagliaio.

SPIVA Scorecard: I Dati Sono Brutali

Periodo% Fondi US Large-Cap Sottoperformanti% Fondi Europei Sottoperformanti
1 Anno~55–65%~60–70%
5 Anni~75–85%~75–85%
15 Anni~90–95%~90–95%

L'Universo degli Indici

ETFIndiceTERCoperturaIdeale Per
VWCEFTSE All-World0,22%~3.700 azioni, 49 paesiDiversificazione globale
IWDAMSCI World0,20%~1.500 azioni, 23 paesi sviluppatiMercati sviluppati
VUAAS&P 5000,07%500 large-cap USACore mercato USA
@WarrenBuffett
Un fondo indicizzato a basso costo è l'investimento azionario più sensato per la grande maggioranza degli investitori.

Portafoglio a Un Solo Fondo

💡 Portafoglio starter Omaha Method: 1) Broker a basso costo. 2) Investimento mensile automatico in VWCE o IWDA. 3) Allocazione per tolleranza al rischio. 4) Ribilanciamento annuale. 5) Non controllare ogni giorno.
⚠️ L'onere della prova è sulla gestione attiva. Se scegliete un fondo attivo, pretendete evidenze: track record auditato 10+ anni, sovraperformance dopo le commissioni.
@CharlieMunger
Il desiderio di arricchirsi in fretta è piuttosto pericoloso. Il modo per arricchirsi lentamente è comprare un fondo indicizzato.

Fonds Indiciels : La Puissance de l'Investissement Passif

Plus de 90 % des fonds gérés activement sous-performent leur indice de référence sur 15 ans. La stratégie la plus simple et la plus efficace : acheter tout le marché.

Le Cas pour l'Indexation

En 1976, John Bogle a lancé le premier fonds indiciel retail. Quatre décennies plus tard, les fonds indiciels détiennent plus de 15 000 milliards de dollars. La logique est irréfutable.

@JohnBogle
Ne cherchez pas l'aiguille dans la botte de foin. Achetez la botte de foin.
ETFIndiceTERCouvertureIdéal Pour
VWCEFTSE All-World0,22 %~3 700 actions, 49 paysDiversification globale
IWDAMSCI World0,20 %~1 500 actionsMarchés développés
VUAAS&P 5000,07 %500 large-cap USCore marché US
@WarrenBuffett
Un fonds indiciel à faible coût est l'investissement le plus sensé pour la grande majorité des investisseurs.
💡 Portefeuille starter : 1) Courtier à bas coût. 2) Investissement mensuel automatique en VWCE. 3) Allocation selon tolérance au risque. 4) Rééquilibrage annuel. 5) Ne pas vérifier chaque jour.
@CharlieMunger
Le désir de s'enrichir vite est assez dangereux. Le moyen de s'enrichir lentement est d'acheter un fonds indiciel.

Subscribe for daily